There was a lengthy discussion about weight distribution on the 31. Seems the consensus was that moving weight aft (if possible) would improve the angle of attach at cruise and therefore improve speed and fuel economy. My question is, if this is true, why not move the batteries to the area behind the rear engine compartment bulkhead? Put them on either side of the tank.
I have Cabrera's decks which gives me broad access to that area.
What do we think of that?
Mikey
Moving weight aft
Moderators: CaptPatrick, mike ohlstein, Bruce
Moving weight aft
Mikey
3/18/1963 - -31-327 factory hardtop express, the only one left.
The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits.
-Albert Einstein
3/18/1963 - -31-327 factory hardtop express, the only one left.
The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits.
-Albert Einstein
Mikey,
Moving weight aft seems appropriate, however, when dealing with the batteries and other weight distribution, keep in mind that the more weight you remove from the centerline of the boat and move outboard will increase rocking and rolling. keeping weight centered and deeper in the hull will act to dampen the rolling effect.
Moving weight aft seems appropriate, however, when dealing with the batteries and other weight distribution, keep in mind that the more weight you remove from the centerline of the boat and move outboard will increase rocking and rolling. keeping weight centered and deeper in the hull will act to dampen the rolling effect.
Harv
- Terry Frank
- Senior Member
- Posts: 229
- Joined: Jun 29th, '06, 15:20
- Location: Morehead City, North Carolina
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 84 guests