Beautiful Boat
Moderators: CaptPatrick, mike ohlstein, Bruce
Beautiful Boat
Lot of wood, but thought some of you might appreciate this boat:
http://www.yachtworld.com/core/listing/ ... id=2094494
You can click on the pictures to enlarge.
JR
http://www.yachtworld.com/core/listing/ ... id=2094494
You can click on the pictures to enlarge.
JR
Randall, if you take away the wood wraparound window frame and the bow rail it looks pretty sharp. Not crazy about the waterline colors...the red and green make it look off at rest.randall wrote:beautiful components , fine craftsmanship, but i dont find it "beautiful" at all. kinda clunky.
Gotta love the poles sitting on the V-berth...
Reminiscent of a Wheeler. Almost expect to see Papa on deck. It's a neat boat and attractive in a retro nostalgic fashion, but on her own I don't love the boat. A few items seem off balance or misplaced
The work that went into it is unquestionable, and I would cerainly take her if someone were giving her to me, but I don't love her looks on the whole.
The work that went into it is unquestionable, and I would cerainly take her if someone were giving her to me, but I don't love her looks on the whole.
Here's another one of Michael's boats:
http://www.yachtworld.com/core/listing/ ... 76454&url=
This one looks a little sleeker than the other one. It's no 31 though. That pic of Zero Cavity in the Cockpit Shade thread is beautiful.
JR
http://www.yachtworld.com/core/listing/ ... 76454&url=
This one looks a little sleeker than the other one. It's no 31 though. That pic of Zero Cavity in the Cockpit Shade thread is beautiful.
JR
Last edited by jackryan on Oct 21st, '09, 23:02, edited 1 time in total.
Okay take off the wood windshield frame, the bow rail, the roof and the tower...now she's looking good!randall wrote:take off the cabin roof and the tower and it would help a lot (in my opinion , obviously) they seem like after thoughts and not well integrated into the design at all. i admit my bias for clean looks. not that roofs and towers cant work anywhere.. they can.
Randall, I think your right about the roof. Seems like alot going on in what should be a simple design.
Although, I like the night shot with the lights in the roof.
JR- that is what a Rybovich should look like- very, very nice. Rook just seems to be an amalgam of styles, part classic Florida fisherman with a bit of New York style Commuter boat tacked on. The lines of the resultant mish mosh just doesn't flow gracefully, IMO.jackryan wrote:Here's another one of Michael's boats:
http://www.yachtworld.com/core/listing/ ... 76454&url=
This one looks a little sleeker than the other one. It's no 31 though. That pic of Zero Cavity in the Cockpit Shade thread is beautiful.
JR
jackryan wrote:Here's another one of Michael's boats:
http://www.yachtworld.com/core/listing/ ... 76454&url=
This one looks a little sleeker than the other one. It's no 31 though. That pic of Zero Cavity in the Cockpit Shade thread is beautiful.
JR
that is much better but still suffers from the same visual flaw that almost all expresses suffer. you design a boat and then after its built you add another piece to the puzzle that wasn't even considered in the original design. on the other hand there was a bare express at the dock in montauk unsold for a few months......and it looked absolutely ridiculous.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 122 guests