I think they were a "little optomistic
Moderators: CaptPatrick, mike ohlstein, Bruce
- thuddddddd
- Senior Member
- Posts: 1028
- Joined: Jun 29th, '06, 07:42
- Location: N. east Ma, home of fat teddy
I think they were a "little optomistic
http://www.hatterasowners.com/Brochures ... CB-002.pdf
thats with 6.2 EFI Horizon mercruisers @4800 rpm
thats with 6.2 EFI Horizon mercruisers @4800 rpm
Re: I think they were a "little optomistic
Blame Ethanol...
Get that thing down to 12,000 lbs and wring it out again!
Get that thing down to 12,000 lbs and wring it out again!
Possunt quia posse videntur
Re: I think they were a "little optomistic
Unless you were running into a 12 MPH current...
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 7036
- Joined: Jun 29th, '06, 21:24
- Location: Hillsdale, New Jersey
- Contact:
Re: I think they were a "little optomistic
Maybe it is that extra 2 inches they squeezed into that 34 foot length.
Like Stephan said lighten it up, and take a good hard look at the props. Maybe they need tweeking.
Like Stephan said lighten it up, and take a good hard look at the props. Maybe they need tweeking.
1975 FBC BERG1467-315
- thuddddddd
- Senior Member
- Posts: 1028
- Joined: Jun 29th, '06, 07:42
- Location: N. east Ma, home of fat teddy
- thuddddddd
- Senior Member
- Posts: 1028
- Joined: Jun 29th, '06, 07:42
- Location: N. east Ma, home of fat teddy
- thuddddddd
- Senior Member
- Posts: 1028
- Joined: Jun 29th, '06, 07:42
- Location: N. east Ma, home of fat teddy
- thuddddddd
- Senior Member
- Posts: 1028
- Joined: Jun 29th, '06, 07:42
- Location: N. east Ma, home of fat teddy
Re: I think they were a "little optomistic
I remember a prop calculator... anyone have the link?
Re: I think they were a "little optomistic
have you christened the boat yet by puking
1968 hull # 316 - 757
- thuddddddd
- Senior Member
- Posts: 1028
- Joined: Jun 29th, '06, 07:42
- Location: N. east Ma, home of fat teddy
Re: I think they were a "little optomistic
Charlie..... I've never puked on a real boat.... mostly RLDT's ..... so no... not this one , or the 41
Last edited by thuddddddd on Sep 19th, '17, 05:04, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 7036
- Joined: Jun 29th, '06, 21:24
- Location: Hillsdale, New Jersey
- Contact:
Re: I think they were a "little optomistic
Timmythuddddddd wrote:I remember a prop calculator... anyone have the link?
It is on boatdiesel.com
1975 FBC BERG1467-315
- thuddddddd
- Senior Member
- Posts: 1028
- Joined: Jun 29th, '06, 07:42
- Location: N. east Ma, home of fat teddy
Re: I think they were a "little optomistic
Thanks Tony..... pretty interesting playing with the calculator.... I need to get a real weight on the boat and some other information
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 7036
- Joined: Jun 29th, '06, 21:24
- Location: Hillsdale, New Jersey
- Contact:
Re: I think they were a "little optomistic
Timmy
Check with your marina. The travel lift usually has a scale on her.
Check with your marina. The travel lift usually has a scale on her.
1975 FBC BERG1467-315
Re: I think they were a "little optomistic
Thuuddd...... Love the boat!
- thuddddddd
- Senior Member
- Posts: 1028
- Joined: Jun 29th, '06, 07:42
- Location: N. east Ma, home of fat teddy
Re: I think they were a "little optomistic
Thanks Tony and Mark...
Funny thing about the prop calculator...with the available info , and even making stuff up (gear ratio/existing prop sizes/hp/total weight ) ... there isn't a lot of performance difference between the various props (on the basic calculator) 20-22knt cruise @4100 , around 20-22 gph... 29-31WOT and 40-44gph ( that is a short day , with on;y 225 gal under the deck) ..... the calculator "loves" something around 17x 15(22knt cruise 31WOT)..... I'm running 20x15's have a set of 17x20's kicking around .... guess I'll have to get actual numbers on the various systems.... but short of a diesel repower I guess I have an idea of real and imagined performance
Funny thing about the prop calculator...with the available info , and even making stuff up (gear ratio/existing prop sizes/hp/total weight ) ... there isn't a lot of performance difference between the various props (on the basic calculator) 20-22knt cruise @4100 , around 20-22 gph... 29-31WOT and 40-44gph ( that is a short day , with on;y 225 gal under the deck) ..... the calculator "loves" something around 17x 15(22knt cruise 31WOT)..... I'm running 20x15's have a set of 17x20's kicking around .... guess I'll have to get actual numbers on the various systems.... but short of a diesel repower I guess I have an idea of real and imagined performance
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 7036
- Joined: Jun 29th, '06, 21:24
- Location: Hillsdale, New Jersey
- Contact:
Re: I think they were a "little optomistic
Timmy
21 gallons an hour is a deal. Heck the 31 with 454s was at least 25 gallons an hour.
21 gallons an hour is a deal. Heck the 31 with 454s was at least 25 gallons an hour.
1975 FBC BERG1467-315
Re: I think they were a "little optomistic
Talk about optimistic...
@4100 I would expect each engine to be nearer to 40 GPH
For My 454s 3100 RPM is about 24 kts at 28gph. I can round up to 1 GPM at about 20 kts with about 2850 if my memory is correct. All this is for calm seas. While the ride is acceptable at 20 kts in some chop the 1 GPM disappears.
My props started life as and are stamped 18X18 however the measure 17.5X17. I have small rudders among other things.
Stick with the imagined performance - it's more durable.
Regards,
S
@4100 I would expect each engine to be nearer to 40 GPH
For My 454s 3100 RPM is about 24 kts at 28gph. I can round up to 1 GPM at about 20 kts with about 2850 if my memory is correct. All this is for calm seas. While the ride is acceptable at 20 kts in some chop the 1 GPM disappears.
My props started life as and are stamped 18X18 however the measure 17.5X17. I have small rudders among other things.
Stick with the imagined performance - it's more durable.
Regards,
S
Possunt quia posse videntur
Re: I think they were a "little optomistic
Stephan,
Funny picture. I have had friends come and ask my advice about this or that 'great deal' they have found on an old boat that needs redone. I always tell them the same thing. Any time you want to fish, hire the best charter in the area, tip them handsomely, stand in the cockpit and throw crumpled up $100.00 bills in to the wake and then giggle knowing you're coming out ahead. That being said, I just like messing around with boats. Wish I had more time for them.
Funny picture. I have had friends come and ask my advice about this or that 'great deal' they have found on an old boat that needs redone. I always tell them the same thing. Any time you want to fish, hire the best charter in the area, tip them handsomely, stand in the cockpit and throw crumpled up $100.00 bills in to the wake and then giggle knowing you're coming out ahead. That being said, I just like messing around with boats. Wish I had more time for them.
Re: I think they were a "little optomistic
DanielM wrote:Stephan,
Funny picture. I have had friends come and ask my advice about this or that 'great deal' they have found on an old boat that needs redone. I always tell them the same thing. Any time you want to fish, hire the best charter in the area, tip them handsomely, stand in the cockpit and throw crumpled up $100.00 bills in to the wake and then giggle knowing you're coming out ahead. That being said, I just like messing around with boats. Wish I had more time for them.
Ain't that the truth!
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 68 guests