Prop time

The Main Sand Box for bertram31.com

Moderators: CaptPatrick, mike ohlstein, Bruce

Post Reply
User avatar
Mikey
Senior Member
Posts: 1475
Joined: Jun 29th, '06, 10:12
Location: White Stone, VA

Prop time

Post by Mikey »

As I draw closer to the time I will actually launch Dreamsicle I thought props might be a logical step. I need from the Faithful two things, unless someone has a pair of suitable props. First, hull speed. Second, maximum diameter of props. From the edge of the shaft at the strut, measuring 90 degrees from the shaft it is 11" to the hull. I recall an ancient post saying the minimum distance from the edge of the prop to the hull should be 1 1/2" and the prop should be no further than 1 1/2" from the strut. Correct?
In other words, what do I do from here? With 6BTA 300's, what now? What info am I leaving out?
Thanks guys
Mikey
3/18/1963 - -31-327 factory hardtop express, the only one left.
The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits.
-Albert Einstein
User avatar
Doug Crowther
Senior Member
Posts: 259
Joined: Jun 29th, '06, 09:22
Location: Beaufort NC & Concord,Va
Contact:

Props

Post by Doug Crowther »

Mikey,
You should be able to run a 21x22. My boat is a lot heavier and I run 20x23. Max hull speed for me is around 31 knts with 1/4 tank of fuel.
You should fly with 300's in that light little Dreamsicle.
I grew up to be the person my parent's warned me about.
User avatar
CaptPatrick
Founder/Admin
Posts: 4161
Joined: Jun 7th, '06, 14:25
Location: 834 Scott Dr., LLANO, TX 78643 - 325.248.0809 bertram31@bertram31.com

Post by CaptPatrick »

Mikey,

You need to supply transmission ratio, whether you'll be going with 3 blade or 4 blade.

Clearance should be no less than 10% of prop diameter. A 20" diameter prop needs 2" of clearance. 20" is the max diameter that Bruce & I will install on a B31 with 15º shaft angle. There are some folks using 21" diameter...

You can acheive 21" performance with a medium cup on the blades without getting into your 2" safety margin...

Br,

Patrick
Br,

Patrick

Molon labe
User avatar
Carl
Senior Member
Posts: 6082
Joined: Jul 5th, '06, 06:45
Location: Staten Island NY

Post by Carl »

What are the safety issues when going into the less then 10% wheel to hull clearance?

I thought it was related only to performance, cavitation or something along those lines.

Thanks,
Carl
User avatar
CaptPatrick
Founder/Admin
Posts: 4161
Joined: Jun 7th, '06, 14:25
Location: 834 Scott Dr., LLANO, TX 78643 - 325.248.0809 bertram31@bertram31.com

Post by CaptPatrick »

Carl,

Too close to the hull and the force of the prop wash will start eating away the hull....

Br,

Patrick
Br,

Patrick

Molon labe
User avatar
Mikey
Senior Member
Posts: 1475
Joined: Jun 29th, '06, 10:12
Location: White Stone, VA

Post by Mikey »

Patrick,
Thanks. Transmissions 1.5/1. No props at all so trying to get the prosective. Back to you, three blade or four?
Speed is good but trolling at less than five knots for rockfish is important. Why can't diesels be slowed down like gassers?
Mikey
3/18/1963 - -31-327 factory hardtop express, the only one left.
The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits.
-Albert Einstein
User avatar
In Memory of Vicroy
Senior Member
Posts: 2340
Joined: Jun 29th, '06, 09:19
Location: Baton Rouge, LA

Post by In Memory of Vicroy »

Mikey - AJ has 21x22 three blades with no cup thru 1.5 gears. I've got about 2" of tip clearance. The 6BTA 250s idle at 650 out of gear and a little over 600 in gear...5.3 kis on both, 3.7 on one, and one is fine if you have Partick's big rudders. Four blades will give you a higher idle speed and a little less top end due to the added drag of the fours. 20x22 threes is where I'd start since the CPL 970s cannot be overloaded even a smigeon or they won't last. You gotta be able to reach 2900+ WOT fully loaded or you are asking for trouble.

Well Faithful, its been a balmy 104 in Baton Rouge the last two days and not a cloud in the sky. All time records for the dates, and my electric bill is gonna make me gasp. Al Gore, call off the dogs of summer.

UV
User avatar
Harry Babb
Senior Member
Posts: 2354
Joined: Jun 30th, '06, 21:45
Location: Fairhope Al
Contact:

Post by Harry Babb »

Hey guys, I'd like to get in on this discussion............I have a pair of the CPL 970's that I am currently rebuilding for DeNada. I purchased them from Dan Diamond, one of Brewsters friends.

Dan told me that the engines had 5400 hours on them.

My question is what makes the 970's so tender.........what exactly fails when they are not wheeled correctly????

When I took the port engine apart (the engine that I was told had a dead cylinder) I found obviously a bad #6 piston, a cracked cylinder head and the cam had some minor flaking on a couple of the lobes. The head was cracked from the injector hole (7 MM dia.....NOT the 9 MM) into the exhaust ports.

Harry Babb
hb
User avatar
In Memory of Vicroy
Senior Member
Posts: 2340
Joined: Jun 29th, '06, 09:19
Location: Baton Rouge, LA

Post by In Memory of Vicroy »

Harry, as I understand it (from boatdiesel.com, Tony Athens, and some other folks) the problem with the CPL 970s was increasing the rpms from 2600 on the 210s and 250s to 2800 on the 300s. The 300 hp CPL 0970 was produced in large numbers, as all the 6Bs were, mostly off road truck use, but a lot of marines.

The problem is that the heads crack (as you saw, much worse with the 9 mm injectors, but will do it with the 7s), and the pistons melt from the excessive exhaust gas temps from running the 970s overloaded. EGT has to stay not more than 900-925 at WOT fully loaded, in the mid to high 800s is a lot better. Cummins fumbled the ball taking the CPL 1247 250s and raising the rated rpms to 2800 on the 0970s from 2600 without doing any beef-ups. Tony Athens (who I consider to be the guru of 6B Cummins) says that a well maintained 0970 will last as long as a 210 or 250 if it is operated as if its a 250.....2400 rpm max cruise, but prop it to make 2850 or 2900 WOT.

UV
User avatar
Vince Luciani
Senior Member
Posts: 172
Joined: Jul 1st, '06, 09:50
Location: Rehoboth Beach, Delaware

Post by Vince Luciani »

Mikey,

I'm running the 330 Cummins with the ZF220A, 1:5 to 1 ratio transmissions. I installed nibral, 3 blade, 21X23 props with a medium pitch. The props were used and given to me by a buddy. They measured slightly less 21" diameter becasue of some prior reconditionings. Everything seems to be OK. Of course I haven't been able to see about the prop wash erosion issue until I pull her at the end of the season. Fully loaded I'm turning 2950 rpm which is 100 rpm over the top end rating. SO I don't think I am over propped. Performance is great! About 22 knots at 2000 rpm and linear from there (i.e., 24 kts at 2200 rpm, etc.) Hope this helps!

Vince (Eiremar repower)
User avatar
Dug
Senior Member
Posts: 2256
Joined: Jun 29th, '06, 11:04
Location: Worcester, MA

Post by Dug »

Mikey,

I strongly recommend you consider 4 blade props. Better bite, higher efficiency, and smoother.

I prefer them very much. I have used them when I had my gas engines, and now am running 4 blades with my diesels.

Dug
User avatar
JP Dalik
Senior Member
Posts: 1317
Joined: Jun 30th, '06, 21:03
Location: Pt. Pleasant NJ
Contact:

Post by JP Dalik »

Mikey,
With 1.5" shafts you don't want to go over 20" diameter. There's a formula that I forgot but it basically says 20 is safe and 21 not so safe.
We run Cummins 330 with ZF 220a 1.5-1 gears.
Props are Michigan 3 blade 20x25 with #5 cup. Cruise at 2500 rpm is close to 28 kts. Wide open throttle is 2890 full fuel, full water, 3 guys. Top speed is 32 ish.
In gear 2 engines is 5.8 kts and 3.2 with one. We do have trolling valves but have not needed them yet. Good Luck
KR


JP
1977 RLDT "CHIMERA"
User avatar
Harry Babb
Senior Member
Posts: 2354
Joined: Jun 30th, '06, 21:45
Location: Fairhope Al
Contact:

Post by Harry Babb »

I believe that the recommended (not to exceed) prop diameter to shaft diameter ratio is 15:1 for normal applications.........This does not apply to High Performance applications.

Now for my OPINION.........when a propeller pitch exceeds the propeller diameter you are getting into high performance.

I would appreciate feedback on "MY opinion"

Harry Babb
hb
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot] and 350 guests