F'glass v. cast iron v. stainless exhaust elbow

The Main Sand Box for bertram31.com

Moderators: CaptPatrick, mike ohlstein, Bruce

Post Reply
User avatar
John F.
Senior Member
Posts: 2114
Joined: Jun 29th, '06, 07:58

F'glass v. cast iron v. stainless exhaust elbow

Post by John F. »

Sorry to be a PIA, but in my quick internet research, I've found that I can get 5" 90 degree exhaust elbows in f'glass from Centek, or cast iron, or ss. I had cast iron on my 454s, and they last forever and were pretty rugged (and crush proof). Any reason I should stick with f'glass, or is it OK to get cast iron. Stainless would have to be custom made I think.

Thanks
1968 B20 Moppie - Hull # 201-937
1969 B31 FBC - Hull # 315-881 (sold)
1977 B31 FBC - Hull # BERG1652M77J (sold)
User avatar
CaptPatrick
Founder/Admin
Posts: 4161
Joined: Jun 7th, '06, 14:25
Location: 834 Scott Dr., LLANO, TX 78643 - 325.248.0809 bertram31@bertram31.com

Re: F'glass v. cast iron v. stainless exhaust elbow

Post by CaptPatrick »

I'd stick with fiberglass and maybe add the crush rings. Cast iron weighs a ton and rusts... If you make sure that you'll have the hose onto the tube by at least 4" there's really no need for crush rings. It's where you're clamping at the very end of the tube that crushing occurs.

Image
Br,

Patrick

Molon labe
User avatar
John F.
Senior Member
Posts: 2114
Joined: Jun 29th, '06, 07:58

Re: F'glass v. cast iron v. stainless exhaust elbow

Post by John F. »

Thanks.
1968 B20 Moppie - Hull # 201-937
1969 B31 FBC - Hull # 315-881 (sold)
1977 B31 FBC - Hull # BERG1652M77J (sold)
User avatar
Bruce
Site Admin
Posts: 3789
Joined: Jun 29th, '06, 12:04
Location: Palm Beach Gardens, Fl.

Re: F'glass v. cast iron v. stainless exhaust elbow

Post by Bruce »

John,
Make sure you get the sweep 90's and not the sharp 90's. Less chance of back pressure and sharp 90's in hydro dynamics is like adding 15' of straight hose in resistance value.
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 130 guests