Folks,
I recently found someone getting out of the offshore game and picked up 4 50vsw setups and want to round out a 5 rod spread with one rod that can handle a planer or deep diver lure for trolling as well as do double duty if I wanted to attempt some live bait fishing where I might encounter a giant.
I would hope to do most of my fishing standup, but I have also setup my boat with a pair of 0 degree swivel rod holders in the stern near the outboard.
I would think that I would put the reel on a bent but 50-130 6' rod and would hope to be able to both albeit not perfect.
Seems like an 80 is probably the better answer to fight out of a rod holder but it is somewhat heavy from my limited experience standup on one. It was doable but not ideal, bigger guys wouldn't have a problem others would.
114oz vs 74oz = 2.5lbs lighter, 65# vs 55# max drag (only usable in rod holder), def going to loose line capacity, probably would run 130 hollow core and 130 topshot
would a 70 be good enough?
Penn 70 vs 80
Moderators: CaptPatrick, mike ohlstein, Bruce
Re: Penn 70 vs 80
Depends on what you consider a giant and how much you want to beat up the fish.
Get something big and aggressive your getting spooled or your chasing the fish. From a pole holder your not playing the fish and I'd side with using brute strength of your equipment to bring in the fish in, an 80 is marginal, 130's to get it in to keep n eat/sell or bring in quick and release with a good chance to live.
Could it be done on smaller...of course. Look at the record books, an old friend of ours has several under his belt with crazy numbers.
My .o2 and worth every penny!
Get something big and aggressive your getting spooled or your chasing the fish. From a pole holder your not playing the fish and I'd side with using brute strength of your equipment to bring in the fish in, an 80 is marginal, 130's to get it in to keep n eat/sell or bring in quick and release with a good chance to live.
Could it be done on smaller...of course. Look at the record books, an old friend of ours has several under his belt with crazy numbers.
My .o2 and worth every penny!
Re: Penn 70 vs 80
Carl,
You are right, kind of like bringing a knife to a gun fight. If I were looking to go commercial it would be 130s.
I do not intend to target giants, won't be sitting out there on the ball with a 3-5# bridled bluefish. I also realize you can't pick who eats a bait so I am more looking for something bigger than a 50 that could cut down the time if I ran into a 70-80" fish and if I hook up to something that is just gonna dump the reel, I would cut the line.
In high school and college I crewed for a captain and giant fished 130s, been there done that. I would prefer to fish stand-up and smaller fish. You can get bigger fish on smaller gear, I have been on a >73" fish on a stella spinning setup, as well on smaller conventional reels none were short fights, spinning was downright no fun stand up in a harness not bad. My legs, arms, back tend to hold up, my wrists don't.
so maybe the question should be what is the largest setup you can reasonably fight stand up?
You are right, kind of like bringing a knife to a gun fight. If I were looking to go commercial it would be 130s.
I do not intend to target giants, won't be sitting out there on the ball with a 3-5# bridled bluefish. I also realize you can't pick who eats a bait so I am more looking for something bigger than a 50 that could cut down the time if I ran into a 70-80" fish and if I hook up to something that is just gonna dump the reel, I would cut the line.
In high school and college I crewed for a captain and giant fished 130s, been there done that. I would prefer to fish stand-up and smaller fish. You can get bigger fish on smaller gear, I have been on a >73" fish on a stella spinning setup, as well on smaller conventional reels none were short fights, spinning was downright no fun stand up in a harness not bad. My legs, arms, back tend to hold up, my wrists don't.
so maybe the question should be what is the largest setup you can reasonably fight stand up?
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 270
- Joined: Jun 29th, '06, 13:30
- Location: Nassau,Bahamas
- Contact:
Re: Penn 70 vs 80
ktm......you don't mention your age.............reel size should correspond!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Preston Burrows
1976 B28 FBC
BERF1398M76J-285
1976 B28 FBC
BERF1398M76J-285
-
- Posts: 824
- Joined: Jul 22nd, '17, 13:59
Re: Penn 70 vs 80
When I was fishing for Bluefin back in the 90's I used an 80 with modified drags on a short 5'-6" stand up rod. Nowadays, you can use pretty much any reel you want because of braid. A 70 will be fine. Add a 100# mono topshot and go to work. Wide reels are a no go on standup. Standard or narrow body reels are best, IMO.
With stand up tackle you can only sustain 25# maybe 30#s of drag for just so long.
With stand up tackle you can only sustain 25# maybe 30#s of drag for just so long.
Rick Ott
Fly N Fish
1969 B31 Flybridge
Hull # Don't have a clue
Fly N Fish
1969 B31 Flybridge
Hull # Don't have a clue
Re: Penn 70 vs 80
my thoughts are a bent butt 70 would be fine stand up and when I get juiced, put it into the swivel rod holder. I would agree with you that I wouldn't push the drag much more than what I would do on a 50, but in a rod holder, having the extra drag would help.
thinking more about it, it seems that I would want to test the drag at multiple points and mark that off on the reel
thinking more about it, it seems that I would want to test the drag at multiple points and mark that off on the reel
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot] and 67 guests