I think they were a "little optomistic

The Main Sand Box for bertram31.com

Moderators: CaptPatrick, mike ohlstein, Bruce

Post Reply
User avatar
thuddddddd
Senior Member
Posts: 1028
Joined: Jun 29th, '06, 07:42
Location: N. east Ma, home of fat teddy

I think they were a "little optomistic

Post by thuddddddd »

http://www.hatterasowners.com/Brochures ... CB-002.pdf

Image



thats with 6.2 EFI Horizon mercruisers @4800 rpm
Stephan
Senior Member
Posts: 655
Joined: Mar 30th, '11, 05:41
Location: Providence, RI

Re: I think they were a "little optomistic

Post by Stephan »

Blame Ethanol...

Get that thing down to 12,000 lbs and wring it out again!
Possunt quia posse videntur
User avatar
Tommy
Senior Member
Posts: 1325
Joined: Jun 29th, '06, 13:36

Re: I think they were a "little optomistic

Post by Tommy »

Unless you were running into a 12 MPH current...
Tony Meola
Senior Member
Posts: 6929
Joined: Jun 29th, '06, 21:24
Location: Hillsdale, New Jersey
Contact:

Re: I think they were a "little optomistic

Post by Tony Meola »

Maybe it is that extra 2 inches they squeezed into that 34 foot length.

Like Stephan said lighten it up, and take a good hard look at the props. Maybe they need tweeking.
1975 FBC BERG1467-315
User avatar
thuddddddd
Senior Member
Posts: 1028
Joined: Jun 29th, '06, 07:42
Location: N. east Ma, home of fat teddy

Re: I think they were a "little optomistic

Post by thuddddddd »

User avatar
thuddddddd
Senior Member
Posts: 1028
Joined: Jun 29th, '06, 07:42
Location: N. east Ma, home of fat teddy

Re: I think they were a "little optomistic

Post by thuddddddd »

User avatar
thuddddddd
Senior Member
Posts: 1028
Joined: Jun 29th, '06, 07:42
Location: N. east Ma, home of fat teddy

Re: I think they were a "little optomistic

Post by thuddddddd »

User avatar
thuddddddd
Senior Member
Posts: 1028
Joined: Jun 29th, '06, 07:42
Location: N. east Ma, home of fat teddy

Re: I think they were a "little optomistic

Post by thuddddddd »

I remember a prop calculator... anyone have the link?
User avatar
Charlie J
Senior Member
Posts: 2207
Joined: Jun 29th, '06, 09:14
Location: freeport n.y

Re: I think they were a "little optomistic

Post by Charlie J »

have you christened the boat yet by puking
1968 hull # 316 - 757
User avatar
thuddddddd
Senior Member
Posts: 1028
Joined: Jun 29th, '06, 07:42
Location: N. east Ma, home of fat teddy

Re: I think they were a "little optomistic

Post by thuddddddd »

Charlie..... I've never puked on a real boat.... mostly RLDT's ..... so no... not this one , or the 41
Last edited by thuddddddd on Sep 19th, '17, 05:04, edited 1 time in total.
Tony Meola
Senior Member
Posts: 6929
Joined: Jun 29th, '06, 21:24
Location: Hillsdale, New Jersey
Contact:

Re: I think they were a "little optomistic

Post by Tony Meola »

thuddddddd wrote:I remember a prop calculator... anyone have the link?
Timmy

It is on boatdiesel.com
1975 FBC BERG1467-315
User avatar
thuddddddd
Senior Member
Posts: 1028
Joined: Jun 29th, '06, 07:42
Location: N. east Ma, home of fat teddy

Re: I think they were a "little optomistic

Post by thuddddddd »

Thanks Tony..... pretty interesting playing with the calculator.... I need to get a real weight on the boat and some other information
Tony Meola
Senior Member
Posts: 6929
Joined: Jun 29th, '06, 21:24
Location: Hillsdale, New Jersey
Contact:

Re: I think they were a "little optomistic

Post by Tony Meola »

Timmy

Check with your marina. The travel lift usually has a scale on her.
1975 FBC BERG1467-315
MarkD
Senior Member
Posts: 236
Joined: Aug 19th, '06, 21:24
Location: Darien, CT
Contact:

Re: I think they were a "little optomistic

Post by MarkD »

Thuuddd...... Love the boat!
User avatar
thuddddddd
Senior Member
Posts: 1028
Joined: Jun 29th, '06, 07:42
Location: N. east Ma, home of fat teddy

Re: I think they were a "little optomistic

Post by thuddddddd »

Thanks Tony and Mark...

Funny thing about the prop calculator...with the available info , and even making stuff up (gear ratio/existing prop sizes/hp/total weight ) ... there isn't a lot of performance difference between the various props (on the basic calculator) 20-22knt cruise @4100 , around 20-22 gph... 29-31WOT and 40-44gph ( that is a short day , with on;y 225 gal under the deck) ..... the calculator "loves" something around 17x 15(22knt cruise 31WOT)..... I'm running 20x15's have a set of 17x20's kicking around .... guess I'll have to get actual numbers on the various systems.... but short of a diesel repower I guess I have an idea of real and imagined performance
Tony Meola
Senior Member
Posts: 6929
Joined: Jun 29th, '06, 21:24
Location: Hillsdale, New Jersey
Contact:

Re: I think they were a "little optomistic

Post by Tony Meola »

Timmy

21 gallons an hour is a deal. Heck the 31 with 454s was at least 25 gallons an hour.
1975 FBC BERG1467-315
Stephan
Senior Member
Posts: 655
Joined: Mar 30th, '11, 05:41
Location: Providence, RI

Re: I think they were a "little optomistic

Post by Stephan »

Talk about optimistic...
@4100 I would expect each engine to be nearer to 40 GPH
For My 454s 3100 RPM is about 24 kts at 28gph. I can round up to 1 GPM at about 20 kts with about 2850 if my memory is correct. All this is for calm seas. While the ride is acceptable at 20 kts in some chop the 1 GPM disappears.
My props started life as and are stamped 18X18 however the measure 17.5X17. I have small rudders among other things.
Stick with the imagined performance - it's more durable.
Regards,
S

Image
Possunt quia posse videntur
User avatar
DanielM
Senior Member
Posts: 397
Joined: Jun 29th, '06, 23:12
Location: Texas coast

Re: I think they were a "little optomistic

Post by DanielM »

Stephan,

Funny picture. I have had friends come and ask my advice about this or that 'great deal' they have found on an old boat that needs redone. I always tell them the same thing. Any time you want to fish, hire the best charter in the area, tip them handsomely, stand in the cockpit and throw crumpled up $100.00 bills in to the wake and then giggle knowing you're coming out ahead. That being said, I just like messing around with boats. Wish I had more time for them.
User avatar
Carl
Senior Member
Posts: 5948
Joined: Jul 5th, '06, 06:45
Location: Staten Island NY

Re: I think they were a "little optomistic

Post by Carl »

DanielM wrote:Stephan,

Funny picture. I have had friends come and ask my advice about this or that 'great deal' they have found on an old boat that needs redone. I always tell them the same thing. Any time you want to fish, hire the best charter in the area, tip them handsomely, stand in the cockpit and throw crumpled up $100.00 bills in to the wake and then giggle knowing you're coming out ahead. That being said, I just like messing around with boats. Wish I had more time for them.

Ain't that the truth!
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Sheer Folly and 4 guests