Bertram31.com General Bulletin Board

Re: food for though

Posted By: Tony Meola
Date: Wednesday, 8 March 2006, at 9:51 p.m.

In Response To: food for though (bob lico)

Bob

I realize that we are all trying to think of options to keep the gassers going and reduce our cost but I have question, if we found a bladder to put in the tank, how would 220 gallons of gas be sloshing around without any baffles. I would think it make us really rock and roll. Also, since the ethanol will make our GPH burned higher than what it is now, the cost of going diesal may start becoming more attractive. Not that I am ready to go diesal, but we need to look at this from all angles in order to make sure we are not just throwing money away. Tony Meola

Messages In This Thread

food for though
bob lico -- Wednesday, 8 March 2006, at 9:18 p.m.

Re: food for though
Tony Meola -- Wednesday, 8 March 2006, at 9:51 p.m.

Re: food for though
mike ohlstein -- Wednesday, 8 March 2006, at 11:43 p.m.

Re: food for though
Harv -- Thursday, 9 March 2006, at 7:57 a.m.

Re: food for though
JP Miller -- Thursday, 9 March 2006, at 6:48 a.m.

Re: food for though
bob lico -- Thursday, 9 March 2006, at 6:48 a.m.

Re: food for though
Mark S -- Thursday, 9 March 2006, at 11:36 a.m.

Re: food for thought- Capy, you out there?
andre fourrier - Louisiana -- Thursday, 9 March 2006, at 12:39 p.m.

Re: food for thought- Capy, you out there?
capy -- Thursday, 9 March 2006, at 1:48 p.m.

Re: food for though
Tony Meola -- Thursday, 9 March 2006, at 9:45 p.m.

Re: food for though
Harv -- Thursday, 9 March 2006, at 10:42 p.m.

Re: food for though
Rawleigh -- Friday, 10 March 2006, at 12:12 p.m.

Re: food for though
Tony Meola -- Friday, 10 March 2006, at 10:55 p.m.

Re: food for though
Rawleigh -- Saturday, 11 March 2006, at 10:32 a.m.

Re: food for though
Harv -- Saturday, 11 March 2006, at 11:36 a.m.

Re: food for though
bob -- Saturday, 11 March 2006, at 6:24 p.m.

Re: food for though
Rawleigh -- Saturday, 11 March 2006, at 7:01 p.m.