Bertram31.com General Bulletin Board

Re: E10, not E85

Posted By: Charlie Haws
Date: Thursday, 23 February 2006, at 5:19 p.m.

In Response To: Re: E10, not E85 (Rawleigh)

Sure we are talking about 10% ETOH (E10), but when they start running E85 TV ads in prime time guess whats going to happen. E10 for CT today E15 for NY tomorrow, E20 for NJ in the winter. Like Harv said ETOH is here to stay. Oh your car may run just fine on E85 with only minor "chip" adjustments. I know my 1965 Sunbeam Alpine ran just fine in almost straight ETOH on the 70's. I got it for free where I worked. Oh one more thing I think ETOH gets blended at the tank farms. I do not believe it gets blended at point of delivery to the fuel tanker truck. I will have to call one of the refinery chemists I work with to get a definitive answer.

Messages In This Thread

Ethanol--Here to Stay
Harv -- Wednesday, 22 February 2006, at 6:38 p.m.

Re: Ethanol--Here to Stay
Bill G -- Wednesday, 22 February 2006, at 7:29 p.m.

Re: Ethanol--Here to Stay
Bob McCarthy -- Wednesday, 22 February 2006, at 8:56 p.m.

Re: Ethanol--Here to Stay
Dug -- Thursday, 23 February 2006, at 9:26 p.m.

Re: Ethanol--Here to Stay
Tony Meola -- Wednesday, 22 February 2006, at 9:45 p.m.

Re: Ethanol--Here to Stay
John B -- Wednesday, 22 February 2006, at 10:22 p.m.

Re: Ethanol--Here to Stay
Paul Haggett -- Thursday, 23 February 2006, at 5:46 a.m.

Re: Ethanol--Here to Stay
CArl -- Thursday, 23 February 2006, at 7:54 a.m.

SS Tanks are GOOD *LINK*
zerocavity -- Thursday, 23 February 2006, at 9:00 a.m.

Re: Ethanol--Here to Stay
DAVIDR -- Thursday, 23 February 2006, at 9:15 a.m.

Re: Ethanol--Here to Stay
Charlie Haws -- Thursday, 23 February 2006, at 9:56 a.m.

Re: Ethanol--Here to Stay
jim wolfe -- Thursday, 23 February 2006, at 10:02 a.m.

Re: Ethanol--Here to Stay
craig mac -- Thursday, 23 February 2006, at 10:27 a.m.

Re: Ethanol--Here to Stay
Walter Kaprielian -- Thursday, 23 February 2006, at 11:17 a.m.

Re: Ethanol--Here to Stay
randall -- Thursday, 23 February 2006, at 11:30 a.m.

Re: Ethanol--Here to Stay
Harv -- Thursday, 23 February 2006, at 11:54 a.m.

Re: Ethanol--Here to Stay
Capt. Dave Kosh -- Thursday, 23 February 2006, at 12:29 p.m.

Re: E10, not E85
Rawleigh -- Thursday, 23 February 2006, at 12:34 p.m.

Re: E10, not E85
Bill G -- Thursday, 23 February 2006, at 2:17 p.m.

Re: E10, not E85
Charlie Haws -- Thursday, 23 February 2006, at 5:19 p.m.

Re: E10, not E85
Tony Meola -- Thursday, 23 February 2006, at 10:34 p.m.

Re: E10, not E85
Charlie Haws -- Friday, 24 February 2006, at 10:07 a.m.

Re: Ethanol--Here to Stay
Peter -- Thursday, 23 February 2006, at 2:51 p.m.

Re: Ethanol--Here to Stay
lobsta1 -- Thursday, 23 February 2006, at 3:56 p.m.

Re: Ethanol--Here to Stay
Rawleigh -- Thursday, 23 February 2006, at 5:16 p.m.

Re: Phone call tomorrow
Harv -- Thursday, 23 February 2006, at 6:36 p.m.

Re: Ethanol--Here to Stay
bob fioresi -- Thursday, 23 February 2006, at 8:29 p.m.

Re: Ethanol--Here to Stay
Kevin Mehegan -- Thursday, 23 February 2006, at 9:06 p.m.

Re: Ethanol--Here to Stay
CArl -- Friday, 24 February 2006, at 8:41 a.m.