Bertram31.com General Bulletin Board

Re: Ethanol--Here to Stay

Posted By: CArl
Date: Thursday, 23 February 2006, at 7:54 a.m.

In Response To: Re: Ethanol--Here to Stay (Paul Haggett)

I am going to sit this year out. Take care of some projects and by then hopefully this thing will be figured out.

As to options on tanks.

If aluminum will be etched it seems like a bad choice unless it can be coated on the inside. Jury is still out on this option.

SS is an option, but not reccommended by some.

New fiberglass may be an expensive option.

Monel is an expensive option.

Steel tanks, cheap and replace every few years.

Boating, even more fun now then yesturday.

Maybe we should pull our old gas filled tanks to Washington and let them figure out what to do with them and the contaminated contents. Or would that be wrong?

Messages In This Thread

Ethanol--Here to Stay
Harv -- Wednesday, 22 February 2006, at 6:38 p.m.

Re: Ethanol--Here to Stay
Bill G -- Wednesday, 22 February 2006, at 7:29 p.m.

Re: Ethanol--Here to Stay
Bob McCarthy -- Wednesday, 22 February 2006, at 8:56 p.m.

Re: Ethanol--Here to Stay
Dug -- Thursday, 23 February 2006, at 9:26 p.m.

Re: Ethanol--Here to Stay
Tony Meola -- Wednesday, 22 February 2006, at 9:45 p.m.

Re: Ethanol--Here to Stay
John B -- Wednesday, 22 February 2006, at 10:22 p.m.

Re: Ethanol--Here to Stay
Paul Haggett -- Thursday, 23 February 2006, at 5:46 a.m.

Re: Ethanol--Here to Stay
CArl -- Thursday, 23 February 2006, at 7:54 a.m.

SS Tanks are GOOD *LINK*
zerocavity -- Thursday, 23 February 2006, at 9:00 a.m.

Re: Ethanol--Here to Stay
DAVIDR -- Thursday, 23 February 2006, at 9:15 a.m.

Re: Ethanol--Here to Stay
Charlie Haws -- Thursday, 23 February 2006, at 9:56 a.m.

Re: Ethanol--Here to Stay
jim wolfe -- Thursday, 23 February 2006, at 10:02 a.m.

Re: Ethanol--Here to Stay
craig mac -- Thursday, 23 February 2006, at 10:27 a.m.

Re: Ethanol--Here to Stay
Walter Kaprielian -- Thursday, 23 February 2006, at 11:17 a.m.

Re: Ethanol--Here to Stay
randall -- Thursday, 23 February 2006, at 11:30 a.m.

Re: Ethanol--Here to Stay
Harv -- Thursday, 23 February 2006, at 11:54 a.m.

Re: Ethanol--Here to Stay
Capt. Dave Kosh -- Thursday, 23 February 2006, at 12:29 p.m.

Re: E10, not E85
Rawleigh -- Thursday, 23 February 2006, at 12:34 p.m.

Re: E10, not E85
Bill G -- Thursday, 23 February 2006, at 2:17 p.m.

Re: E10, not E85
Charlie Haws -- Thursday, 23 February 2006, at 5:19 p.m.

Re: E10, not E85
Tony Meola -- Thursday, 23 February 2006, at 10:34 p.m.

Re: E10, not E85
Charlie Haws -- Friday, 24 February 2006, at 10:07 a.m.

Re: Ethanol--Here to Stay
Peter -- Thursday, 23 February 2006, at 2:51 p.m.

Re: Ethanol--Here to Stay
lobsta1 -- Thursday, 23 February 2006, at 3:56 p.m.

Re: Ethanol--Here to Stay
Rawleigh -- Thursday, 23 February 2006, at 5:16 p.m.

Re: Phone call tomorrow
Harv -- Thursday, 23 February 2006, at 6:36 p.m.

Re: Ethanol--Here to Stay
bob fioresi -- Thursday, 23 February 2006, at 8:29 p.m.

Re: Ethanol--Here to Stay
Kevin Mehegan -- Thursday, 23 February 2006, at 9:06 p.m.

Re: Ethanol--Here to Stay
CArl -- Friday, 24 February 2006, at 8:41 a.m.