Bertram31.com General Bulletin Board

Re: Ethanol--Here to Stay

Posted By: Tony Meola
Date: Wednesday, 22 February 2006, at 9:45 p.m.

In Response To: Ethanol--Here to Stay (Harv)

Harv
I would love to join in the fray but from what I have seen the only ones who win in a class action are the attorneys. No offense to UV. I don't want to be negative but I am not sure we would get anything out of it. By the time its over we would all have put in new tanks or new engines and what we would get in return wouldn't even cover the cost of the time to pull the decks. Anyone have any other thoughts. Tony Meola

Messages In This Thread

Ethanol--Here to Stay
Harv -- Wednesday, 22 February 2006, at 6:38 p.m.

Re: Ethanol--Here to Stay
Bill G -- Wednesday, 22 February 2006, at 7:29 p.m.

Re: Ethanol--Here to Stay
Bob McCarthy -- Wednesday, 22 February 2006, at 8:56 p.m.

Re: Ethanol--Here to Stay
Dug -- Thursday, 23 February 2006, at 9:26 p.m.

Re: Ethanol--Here to Stay
Tony Meola -- Wednesday, 22 February 2006, at 9:45 p.m.

Re: Ethanol--Here to Stay
John B -- Wednesday, 22 February 2006, at 10:22 p.m.

Re: Ethanol--Here to Stay
Paul Haggett -- Thursday, 23 February 2006, at 5:46 a.m.

Re: Ethanol--Here to Stay
CArl -- Thursday, 23 February 2006, at 7:54 a.m.

SS Tanks are GOOD *LINK*
zerocavity -- Thursday, 23 February 2006, at 9:00 a.m.

Re: Ethanol--Here to Stay
DAVIDR -- Thursday, 23 February 2006, at 9:15 a.m.

Re: Ethanol--Here to Stay
Charlie Haws -- Thursday, 23 February 2006, at 9:56 a.m.

Re: Ethanol--Here to Stay
jim wolfe -- Thursday, 23 February 2006, at 10:02 a.m.

Re: Ethanol--Here to Stay
craig mac -- Thursday, 23 February 2006, at 10:27 a.m.

Re: Ethanol--Here to Stay
Walter Kaprielian -- Thursday, 23 February 2006, at 11:17 a.m.

Re: Ethanol--Here to Stay
randall -- Thursday, 23 February 2006, at 11:30 a.m.

Re: Ethanol--Here to Stay
Harv -- Thursday, 23 February 2006, at 11:54 a.m.

Re: Ethanol--Here to Stay
Capt. Dave Kosh -- Thursday, 23 February 2006, at 12:29 p.m.

Re: E10, not E85
Rawleigh -- Thursday, 23 February 2006, at 12:34 p.m.

Re: E10, not E85
Bill G -- Thursday, 23 February 2006, at 2:17 p.m.

Re: E10, not E85
Charlie Haws -- Thursday, 23 February 2006, at 5:19 p.m.

Re: E10, not E85
Tony Meola -- Thursday, 23 February 2006, at 10:34 p.m.

Re: E10, not E85
Charlie Haws -- Friday, 24 February 2006, at 10:07 a.m.

Re: Ethanol--Here to Stay
Peter -- Thursday, 23 February 2006, at 2:51 p.m.

Re: Ethanol--Here to Stay
lobsta1 -- Thursday, 23 February 2006, at 3:56 p.m.

Re: Ethanol--Here to Stay
Rawleigh -- Thursday, 23 February 2006, at 5:16 p.m.

Re: Phone call tomorrow
Harv -- Thursday, 23 February 2006, at 6:36 p.m.

Re: Ethanol--Here to Stay
bob fioresi -- Thursday, 23 February 2006, at 8:29 p.m.

Re: Ethanol--Here to Stay
Kevin Mehegan -- Thursday, 23 February 2006, at 9:06 p.m.

Re: Ethanol--Here to Stay
CArl -- Friday, 24 February 2006, at 8:41 a.m.